a type of digital currency- Top People also ask

The top losers are historical highs, PEEK materials, humanoid robots, Sora concepts, reducers, and other sectors, which are biased towards science and technology.Judging from the actual disk situation, the volume of transactions is slightly enlarged, which is a relatively mild state. The three major indexes all rely on the short-term moving average to support the upward shock.A clearly pointed out in the afternoon review that it was still on the way to the upside near the close of the morning, so personally, the market will continue to fluctuate and rise in the afternoon, and the important pressure level of the Shanghai Composite Index is still near the high point of 3500 rebound. The probability of going directly today is small, and the high probability is to go to the top. The high opening on Tuesday has already digested some of the pressure on the upper plate, and it will be basically good to digest it a little.

Only the small-cap stock line of the GEM index is running far below, and the activity of individual stocks has picked up. At the close, 3,536 stocks in the two cities rose and fell by 1,717 stocks, with 155 daily limit and 7 daily limit.Big financial and other weighted sectors collectively counterattacked. The top gainers were commercial chains, tourism, tax-free concepts, prepared vegetables, new retail, food and beverage, and consumer sectors.There are many short-term opportunities, but the consumer sector is stronger than expected, and this wave is missed. Before, the high target showed a short-term oversold rebound, but the persistence will not be high. This rebound should run fast, otherwise it is best not to grab it, because the probability of getting out of the second wave is too small.

Summary: Short-term or split-oriented, the high standard has been killed, the plates are all high and low, and the long-term continues to hold!The top losers are historical highs, PEEK materials, humanoid robots, Sora concepts, reducers, and other sectors, which are biased towards science and technology.